Book Description
A challenge of the belief that the mind is a blank slate.
If You Just Remember One Thing
Human behavioral traits are 40-50% shaped by genetics, 0-10% by shared envir... More
Bullet Point Summary and Quotes
- "'Man will become better when you show him what he is like,' wrote Chekhov, and so the new sciences of human nature can help lead the way to a realistic, biologically informed humanism."
- The Blank Slate theory, popularized by John Locke, argues that the human mind has no innate traits and is
formed entirely by experience.
- It suggests that social reform can improve humanity and that differences between people are not due to inborn qualities but to different environments.
- This is also called empiricism.
- The Noble Savage theory, associated with Jean-Jacques Rousseau, says that humans are naturally good,
peaceful, and selfless.
- It argues that negative traits like greed, violence, and inequality are not inherent to human nature but are byproducts of civilization.
- This is also called romanticism.
- The Ghost in the Machine theory, originated from René Descartes, separates the mind (the "ghost") from the
physical body (the "machine").
- It suggests that qualities like free will cannot be explained by mechanics or biology.
- This is also called dualism.
- The early 20th-century intellectual landscape was full of racist and sexist theories that used biology to justify social hierarchies that led to horrific real-world consequences (like eugenics and the Holocaust). As a result, a moral and ideological movement arose to reject any link between biology and human behavior.
- Behaviorism created a more egalitarian science of the mind. Behaviorism treated the mind as a blank slate, denied the existence of instincts or innate abilities, and argued that all behavior is simply learned through environmental conditioning (stimulus, response, and reward). This idea was championed by figures like John B. Watson and B.F. Skinner.
- In anthropology and sociology, thinkers like Franz Boas and his students established the Standard Social Science Model. This model posits that human nature is malleable (like Silly Putty) and is shaped entirely by culture, which is seen as separate from the minds of individuals.
- Advances in cognitive science and neuroscience demonstrate that the mind is not a non-physical "ghost" but is the computational activity of the brain. Every aspect of our mental life, including the "self," is a product of brain activity. This system requires complex circuitry to function, which refutes the idea of the mind as a blank slate.
- Language learning shows that the mind is not just a blank slate for recording. If it was, we would only be able to repeat what we've heard, yet we're capable of constructing new phrases from an early age.
- Genetics shows that many psychological traits are heritable, and evolutionary psychology explains that our minds are shaped by natural selection, which includes motives for conflict and self-interest that are inconsistent with the idea of an inherently peaceful nature (The Noble Savage).
- Culture is a natural product of our evolved psychology. It is an innovation that helps people survive and cooperate.
- Humans are equipped with a "theory of mind" to understand the intentions behind others' actions, which allows us to learn and accumulate useful behaviors.
- People conform to cultural norms for two key reasons: to benefit from the pooled knowledge of others (informational) and to coordinate social behavior for mutual benefit, creating shared realities like laws and money (normative).
- Major differences between cultures are not random or racial but can be explained by geography and ecology. The ability to accumulate and spread innovations was heavily influenced by factors like a continent's orientation and the availability of domesticable species, which gave some societies a head start.
- There are typically three modern arguments for the Blank Slate theory. All three have issues.
- The lean genome argument says that a smaller-than-expected number of human genes proves we are products of our environment. However, complexity arises from how genes interact, not their quantity.
- The connectionism (neural networks) argument says the brain is a generic, blank, all-purpose learning machine like a neural network. However, effective neural networks require pre-existing structure.
- The neural plasticity argument says the brain's plasticity is proof of a blank slate. However, neural plasticity is a mechanism for development within rigid genetic constraints, not a sign of limitless malleability. For example, children who lose function of specific brain regions related to face recognition or social reasoning fail to develop those abilities, even with years of normal experience and an otherwise healthy brain. Another example, gay people can't learn to be straight.
- “According to a recent study of the brains of identical and fraternal twins, differences in the amount of gray matter in the frontal lobes are not only genetically influenced but are significantly correlated with differences in intelligence. A study of Albert Einstein's brain revealed that he had large, unusually shaped inferior parietal lobules, which participate in spatial reasoning and intuitions about number. Gay men are likely to have a smaller third interstitial nucleus in the anterior hypothalamus, a nucleus known to have a role in sex differences. And convicted murderers and other violent, antisocial people are likely to have a smaller and less active prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain that governs decision making and inhibits impulses. These gross features of the brain are almost certainly not sculpted by information coming in from the senses, which implies that differences in intelligence, scientific genius, sexual orientation, and impulsive violence are not entirely learned.”
- Scientific inquiry into human nature is often met with hostility, because the Blank Slate theory has become
a sacred doctrine against inequality for many intellectuals. People have equated moral values like equality to the
non-existence of human nature, thus forcing them to attack any scientific evidence supporting innate
traits.
- James Neel and Napoleon Chagnonm, who worked on biological explanations of human behavior, were falsely accused of deliberately starting a fatal measles epidemic.
- Everyone on the political spectrum shares a fear that a biological understanding of human nature will destroy personal responsibility and be used to justify immoral behavior (e.g., "my genes made me do it.").
- Equality on the claim of biological sameness is dangerous. Instead, equality should be a moral stance that
condemns judging individuals by their groups.
- “To repeat: equality is not the empirical claim that all groups of humans are interchangeable; it is the moral principle that individuals should not be judged or constrained by the average properties of their group.”
- The Blank Slate is not a morally safe alternative, as this ideology has also led to atrocities. Regimes under Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot used the idea of reshaping "human raw material" to justify totalitarian control and mass murder.
- Genetic differences are far greater among individuals within any single group than they are, on average, between groups (like races). This undermines the biological basis for racism.
- The "fear of imperfectibility" says that an innate, flawed human nature would make social reform impossible
and might seem to endorse negative traits like violence, selfishness, and infidelity as "natural" and therefore
good.
- This fear is rooted in the "naturalistic fallacy" (what is natural is good) and the "moralistic fallacy" (what is good must be natural). However, nature is often brutal and immoral, and humans can and should strive to rise above it.
- Moral and social progress is possible not in spite of human nature, but because of it. Our minds are complex systems that can counteract our baser instincts.
- The “fear of determinism” says that biological explanations for behavior will eliminate personal
responsibility. This fear is misguided because we should view responsibility as a tool for deterrence. We hold
people accountable for their actions to discourage them, and others, from committing harmful acts. We exempt
certain people from responsibility (e.g., children, the legally insane) not because their actions are
"determined,” but because they lack the cognitive capacity to be deterred by the threat of punishment.
- People often fear biological excuses ("my genes made me do it") and accept environmental ones ("my bad childhood made me do it"), but any explanation can be wrongly used to deflect blame. We need to distinguish between explanation and exculpation.
- The “fear of nihilism” is the concern that biological explanations of the mind reduces humans to
gene-replicating machines. This is misguided because there's a distinction between a gene's
ultimate goal (replication) and a person's proximate motive (genuine,
heartfelt altruism or love) that helps with the ultimate goal. A selfish ultimate goal can, and often does,
produce a genuinely unselfish proximate effect, and the pursuit of happiness exists beyond genetics and biological
impulses.
- Even if our values and feelings are products of the brain, they're still real.
- A religious "spiritual soul" is not necessary for morality. An evolved, innate moral sense provides a more reliable foundation for ethics than religious doctrines, which have historically been used to justify cruelty.
- The brain constantly sorts people and things into quick categories. This hard-wired survival mechanism for
survival leads to stereotypes, making problematic ideas like racism and sexism more than just social
constructs.
- Conversely, abstract things like mathematics feel unintuitive because the brain didn't evolve for them.
- We've evolved to cooperate and have compassion because these qualities help us survive, but these impulses are strongest toward kin and tribe, so we're neither egoists nor altruists.
- Our evolved moral sense can be irrational and leads to strong judgments based on emotional reactions rather
than a logical assessment of harm.
- For example, most of us would be repulsed by someone finding a roadkill dog and then eating it, although no harm was done.
- Studies of twins separated at birth suggest that genetic factors influence political preferences.
- Evidence like prehistoric war records and innate toddler aggression suggest that genetic factors influence violent tendencies.
- There are two types of feminism. Equity feminism is a moral doctrine for equal rights and opportunity. Gender feminism is an empirical doctrine based on the idea that all sex differences are socially constructed. We should focus on equity feminism, as gender feminism is scientifically unsupported.
- Men and women have observable differences in brain structure and average cognitive strengths (e.g., men in spatial-manipulation and risk-taking, women in language skills and reading social cues), but this doesn't imply one sex is superior, as both share equal general intelligence.
- “Feminism as a movement for political and social equity is important, but feminism as an academic clique committed to eccentric doctrines about human nature is not. Eliminating discrimination against women is important, but believing that women and men are born with indistinguishable minds is not. Freedom of choice is important, but ensuring that women make up exactly 50 percent of all professions is not. And eliminating sexual assaults is important, but advancing the theory that rapists are doing their part in a vast male conspiracy [and that rape is not about sex] is not.”
- Psychologist Eric Turkheimer, based on empirical results that have been replicated, developed the three laws
of behavioral genetics.
- All human behavioral traits (e.g., intelligence, personality) are heritable.
- The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of the genes.
- A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families. (In other words, one's unique environment, which includes peers, neighborhoods, etc., has significant impact.)
- Summary: Genes 40-50%, shared environment 0-10%, unique environment 50%
- “Identical twins are 50 percent similar whether they grow up together or apart.”
- The creation and appreciation of art are innate, evolutionary aspects of human nature, possibly linked to
mating instincts.
- Art engagement is at a record high thanks to increased access and technology.
- The perception that art is dying stems from a shift in modern art, which often rejects traditional beauty (like landscapes and pleasant melodies) in favor of abstract concepts and dissonant sounds.
The Blank Slate: Resources
- Download this summary and 170+ other top nonfiction book summaries in one book (PDF, eBook, DOCX)
- Buy the book